Tag Archives: 19 staniford st. boston

Human Resource Manager Vindicated

Posted on February 19, 2015 by Admin

Recently, Attorney Murphy’s client, former human resources manager of a reputable k-12 mathematics program, received a favorable decision after a highly contentious unemployment hearing. The unemployment office initially denied the client’s claim stating that the client resigned because he disagreed … Continue reading →

Posted in Employment Law | Tagged 19 staniford st. boston, 25(e)(1), boston employment attorney, DUA (division of unemployment assistance), human resource manager, involuntary quit, method of operations, resignation, unemployment hearing, voluntary quit, work policies | Leave a comment

Pro Bono Matters: Preventive Measures in the Workplace

Posted on October 23, 2014 by Admin

Recently, Attorney Murphy took on a pro bono unemployment matter for a client who did not deserve to be fired. The client was a case manager at a Boston area hospital. The client’s former supervisor accused the client of being insubordinate … Continue reading →

Posted in Employment Law | Tagged 19 staniford st. boston, human resources, insubordination, preventive measures, pro bono attorney boston Massachusetts, unemployment hearing | Leave a comment

Good Employee Falls Through the Cracks

Posted on January 30, 2014 by Admin

Recently, Attorney Murphy’s client received a favorable decision after an administrative unemployment benefits hearing of the Division of Unemployment Assistance (DUA). The DUA originally denied the client unemployment benefits because he quit his job. The client was a high performing … Continue reading →

Posted in Employment Law | Tagged 19 staniford st. boston, 25(e)(1), appealing unemployment benefits, boston employment lawyer, DUA (division of unemployment assistance), forced to quit, involuntary quit, toxic environment, unemployment lawyer, unhealthy workplace | Leave a comment

Good Cause to Quit

Posted on December 11, 2013 by Admin

Recently, Attorney Murphy received an unemployment benefits decision in favor of his client, a former assistant retail store manager. This case presented significant legal hurdles because the client quit her job. Indeed, the Division of Unemployment Assistance (DUA) determined the … Continue reading →

Posted in Employment Law | Tagged 19 staniford st. boston, dua, employment attorney, good cause, good cause attributable to employer, hostile working conditions, quit, toxic work environment, unemployment attorney, unemployment benefits, urgent and compelling circumstances | Leave a comment